On a construction site, in a client meeting or during a work handover, the most time-consuming part is rarely the discussion itself. It is turning the conversation into minutes, a list of actions and a clear confirmation of who is responsible. According to the French public service FranceNum, AI works best at the first two stages: capturing the conversation and organising it into a document with decisions, actions, responsible persons and deadlines.
According to FranceNum, a proper document should contain a header with the date, purpose and participants, then decisions listed separately, an action plan in the form: task, owner, deadline, as well as open issues and the date of the next meeting. This matters because in handovers and project meetings the goal is not a “nice summary” but a record that can be used operationally afterwards.
The FranceNum description outlines a simple working model: first a recording or notes, then a transcription, and only then structuring by AI. The service also stresses that when preparing the document, exact figures and quoted information from the conversation should be preserved.
In practice, this means three steps:
A similar approach is described in practical documentation from the design industry, based on Polish-language material from airassvet.ru: the minutes should refer back to source fragments of the meeting, and each instruction should have a history of agreements and a link to the task. This distinction between a “transcript” and “minutes” is important. A transcript preserves the course of the conversation, while the minutes select only what matters for further work.
According to FranceNum, participants must be informed before recording about the purpose of data collection, how long it will be stored and how they can object. Modern Office Manager, in turn, points out that for meetings and communication, rules for informing participants must be set, consent for recording or transcription must be obtained where required, and notes should not contain excessive data.
These sources point to a practical minimum implementation set:
According to Sostav and FranceNum, the same elements most often recur: date, participants, purpose, decisions, tasks, owners, deadlines, open issues and risks. Materials from Airassvet and FranceNum also add a requirement to link agreements to a specific project and to keep a reference to source fragments of the conversation.
It is therefore worth treating AI not as a text generator, but as a tool for moving from a conversation to a working document. It works best where the desired result is known in advance: a formal handover protocol, a task list after a meeting, or a note for the client with confirmed agreements.
Lub System helps B2B companies implement AI, automation and IT solutions end-to-end - from strategy to deployment. See our services or get in touch to discuss your case.